You’re living in two worlds. Are you adapting to the second one?
The economist Tyler Cowen puts it this way: “Thirty years from now you’ll look back and marvel — I had the privilege of living in two completely different worlds: the pre-AI world and the post-AI world.” The surprise is how little the intelligence has shown up in the data. His explanation is uncomfortable and, I think, correct.
Answer honestly. It scores itself, on the page, the moment you finish.
The tell isn’t whether you use AI. It’s whether you’ve changed what you do because of it.
Cowen’s own move is the whole lesson: at 64, seeing that the models could out-write him, he reallocated two-thirds of his effort away from writing and toward the things a model can’t do — talks, mentoring, being in the room. He chose his work to stay ahead of the machines, and he did it in a ten-minute window the day he first saw GPT-4.
I made a smaller version of that call. I’m an MD who stopped writing about healthcare and started shipping it — software, companies, an accountable layer that puts a named human on the work. That reallocation is my adaptation. If the result above stung a little, good — that’s the signal to move. See what I’m building →
Framework and quotations from Tyler Cowen, in conversation on the pre-AI / post-AI transition (source interview). This is a reflective self-assessment, not a validated instrument — the point is the honest look, not the number.
Blaine Warkentine, MD · blainomd.com